A Legacy of Violations of the U.S. Bill of Rights, Hyperlinked


Wednesday, 26 February 2014

A Legacy of Violations of the U.S. Bill of Rights, Hyperlinked

Written by  Thomas R. Eddlem

A Legacy of Violations of the U.S. Bill of Rights, Hyperlinked

The U.S. Bill of Rights is nothing more than a list of powers denied to the U.S federal government by the American people. And by the provisions of the “due process” and “equal protection” provisions of the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution, these prohibitions apply to states and local governments as well. The 14th amendment says, in part: “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” 

Nevertheless, every part of the prohibitions listed in the U.S. Bill of Rights has been violated by the federal or state governments at one time or another in American history. Below is the text of each prohibition listed in the Bill of Rights, followed by one or more links to present or historical violations.

British Parliamentarian William Pitt the Younger said in a November 18, 1783 speech in the House of Commons: 

ULINE Shipping Supplies

Huge Catalog! Over 31,000 Products. Same Day Shipping from 11 Locations


Was it not necessity that which had always been the plea of every illegal exertion of power or exercise of oppression? Was not necessity the pretense of every usurpation? Necessity was the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It was the argument of tyrants; it was the creed of slaves.

The violations listed below — while by no means an exhaustive list — are an indication that the Bill of Rights has been under occasional attack using the guise of “necessity” throughout American history, especially during the nation’s times of war and national crisis. And the links also demonstrate that despite the unquestioned American military supremacy over any combination of foreign nations today, the Bill of Rights faces more threat today under manufactured “necessity” than ever before. 

Amendment I

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”

1838: Missouri Mormon Extermination Order

1844: Philadelphia Bible Riots

2006: Massachusetts Catholics Charities and Adoption

2011: Spying on Muslims

2013: ObamaCare birth control mandate

“or abridging the freedom of speech,”

1863: Clement Vallandigham

1918: Eugene Debs

2013: Yakima, Washington

“or of the press;”

1861-65: Lincoln censorship

1798: Sedition Act

1798: Cooper/Callender/Lyon prosecutions

1918: Sedition Act 

1919: Charles Schenck

2013: Surveillance of journalists

“or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,”

1866: Civil Rights marchers New Orleans

1950s-60s: CoIntelpro

1965: Civil rights marchers Selma

2004: Free speech zones

2011: Disbursement of Occupy Protesters

“and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

1836-44: Slavery gag rule

1907: Tilman Act

2002: McCain-Feingold law

Amendment II

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

1934: National Firearms Act

1968: Gun Control Act

1993: Brady Act

2005: Gun confiscation Hurricane Katrina

2014: Background checks

2014: Federal gun laws 

2014: California laws

2014: Connecticut laws

Amendment III

“No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.”

1812-14: War of 1812

1861-65: Civil War

1941-45: Aleutian Islands during WWII

1979: Engblom v. Carey

2013: Henderson, Nevada

Amendment IV

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

1919-20: Palmer Raids

1861-65: Lincoln wiretapping

1950s-60s: CoIntelpro

1950s-60s: MK-Ultra

1970s: NSA

2004-Present: FBI National Security Letters 

2014: NSA

Amendment V

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;”

2002-05: Jose Padilla

2004: Yaser el-Hamdi

“nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb;”

2000-present: Stalking cases

“nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,”

1982: Stanley Wrice

2004: Al-Nashiri

2008: Mohammed Jawad

2009: Fouad Al-Rabiah

2011: Binyam Mohamed

“nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;”

1814: Andrew Jackson suspends Habeas Corpus

1861-65: Lincoln suspends Habeas Corpus

1863: Ex Parte Vallandigham

1945-47: Habeas Corpus suspended in Eisentranger case

2002-04: Murat Kurnaz denied Habeas Corpus

“nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

2011: Sacketts v. EPA

2014: Civil forfeiture laws

Amendment VI

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,”

1857: Dred Scott

1863: Ex Parte Vallandigham

1942: Ex Parte Quirin

2005-07: Jose Padilla

2006: Military Commissions Act

2011-present: NDAA

“and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor,”

2002: Rasul v. Bush

2002-07: Military Commissions  

2013: al-Nashiri case

“and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.”

2002-05: Jose Padilla

2004: Yaser el-Hamdi

2012: Guantanamo and Obama

Amendment VII

“In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”

1996: EPA v. Condor Land

2008: Texas Tolls

2012: Entin v. Provident Life 

2013: Baldauf v. Florida DOR

2013: Chevron v. Donziger

Amendment VIII

“Excessive bail shall not be required,”

2004: Robert Durst

2004-08: Michigan judge

2012: Activist bail

“nor excessive fines imposed,”

2012: EPA fines

2013: FERC fines

“nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”

2002: Khalid El-Masri

2002-03: Maher Arar

2002-05: Murat Kurnaz

2003: Omar Deghayes

2003-05: Waterboarding

2003-07: Binyam Muhammad

2012: Abu Omar

Amendment IX

“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

2010-present: Right to anonymous political speech

2014: Freedom not to associate

2014: Right to know government actions

2014: Freedom from identity cards

Amendment X

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

2014: Unconstitutional federal agencies

2014 Unconstitutional federal agencies (list 2)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.